Although Poe does not focus on the existence of God or any other kind of supernatural superior creature, in some of his tales he makes some reference to religion. In relation to this topic Poe demonstrates a joyful attitude but, at the same time, a horrifying terror. He plays with hypnosis as a technique that is able to alter the concept of death, to manipulate and even to control it. Both authors deal with death and all its manifestations. Poe deals with natural deaths, necrophilia, reincarnations, murders, and cataleptic attacks that make people appear as if they were dead.
In many of his tales, characters have to face death through a dangerous psychological or physical situation. During this process, these characters experience a certain calm in the presence of death. This presence of corpses, taken to the extreme, leads to a necrophilical obsession. The investigation of the unknown involves a questioning of the limits between death and life. That is why in some of their narrations, the main characters go through experiences in which there is a transition between the two states.
In this story, a suicidal is given the opportunity of, after dead, living a sort of dream in which he can accomplish all of his aspirations. However, he is not conscious of his situation. He does not know that he is already dead. Once all of his dreams have been achieved, death awakens him and tells him he has been dreaming.
At this point, he knows he is dead but, at the same time, he is still alive and talking and feeling. In the first, there is a premature burying of a woman. One of the consequences of these unclear relations between life and death is the creation of an extremely dream-like atmosphere. The relation between death and life, and the non-clear limits between them, involves a reevaluation of the conception of the time and space in which the action takes place.
If the reality of life and human condition are to be doubted, then one needs to start from a different conception of time and space.
According to Bonet, there are some similarities with Poe in his use of imaginary spaces that do not give an appearance of reality. In this kind of space, the narrator and the characters move nervously towards areas that become more and more mythical, deceptive and unbelievable:. After setting the scene, he immediately describes the characters and creates a rarefied atmosphere.
There is great symbolism in the use of weather elements like rain, storms, coldness, heat, and especially obscurity. The night serves to create an intimate atmosphere and to hide and disguise different aspects of reality. The night is also the time of dreams and unconsciousness. Closely related to space is the presence of cosmic travels, through which the authors reflect on cosmogony and world mysteries.
It gave out no light, properly so called, but a dull and sullen glow without reflection, as if all its rays were polarized.
- El Filibusterismo (Original Spanish Version);
- Booktalking Bonanza: Ten Ready-To-Use Multimedia Sessions for the Busy Librarian!
- Ich beschütze dich: Psychothriller (German Edition).
- Girls Only: Sybian Sorority;
- Osito, First Edition;
- The Legend of Atticus Rex Book 1: The Amulet;
These physical travels are also symbolic travels to the unknown and mysterious regions, but also to the dark side of human beings. They show their concerns about the cosmic mysteries within Nature. At some point in the stories, time seems to be frozen, especially during cosmic trips or transitional periods between life and death. As for Poe, one finds the same cosmic treatment of time.
Time leads to another main constitutive element of the short stories: the narrator. Their stories are primarily written in first person. Through his presence as an eyewitness, the narrator tries to give empirical validity to the outrageous events.
This helps to create the feeling of objectivity and verisimilitude. In the stories of both authors, it is common, therefore, to find more than one narrator. Lo atestiguo con todo el pavor que puede sentir el alma humana! Poe also uses this device of affirming that his narration is a real event. Both authors are aiming at a common intention, which is to intensify the terror and make the reader feel overwhelmed by the nature of the events going on.
He does not dare to take a step away from a moral ideology that conceives literature as an art that transmits truths and moral allegories. On the other hand, Poe completely overcomes this classic concept of art. Most of the time, these characters are women. There is also in both authors a big difference between the way masculine and feminine characters are defined.
Males are active, sometimes even aggressive and provoking. They move the action forward, and they are always the narrators. Even when women seem to be the protagonists of the tales, male characters manage to lead the voice of the narration. The female figure may symbolize the transgression of a natural order. Very often, they also offer a double personality or identity. Female characters tend to be young and extremely beautiful, and yet this beauty is a source of disturbing reactions and suffering for men.
La balada de Buster Scruggs
Women seem to be there as blank screens in which men can project their own psychology. In this fascination, however, Poe was by no means alone, for if, as Nina Baym has suggested, sentimental literature eschewed the narrative of seduction in the second quarter of the nineteenth century, it nevertheless manifested an increasing, even obsessional, interest in the spectacle of the death of innocent victims Elmer In male characters, one also sees an obsession with the female figure.
The obsession goes so far as to make men follow these women even beyond death. On the other hand, these feminine characters seem to move in a special undefined territory between life and death. This is very clear by the way the author describes them. Though this female figure is not a real nor completely living entity, the fact that the reader sees her physical presence reinforces her ambiguous and horrifying role in these narrations. This is an image that has pursued him since his childhood.
This object is a medallion that belonged to a Russian soldier who was cruelly assassinated by a Spanish soldier. This object is a connection that puts together two different geographies, historical events, characters, times and stories. In both authors there is a fetichist obsession with objects that turns them into symbols of emotional and psychological conditions, creating a strong link between internal states and the physicality of the things around us:.
Como advierte Edmund H. However, they succeed in creating a terrifying atmosphere. This prevalence of objects has a paradoxical effect. On one hand, it situates the action within a realistic and detailed environment and, therefore, it makes the story more realistic. On the other hand, there is almost a personification of these objects that play a symbolic role, and this makes the stories closer to fantastic literature. Either way, this works in different manners in the two authors.
Through the intensive use of objects these authors accomplish a subversive destruction of our conception of reality. They weaken the borders between fantasy and reality, between imagination and rationality, and between magic and science. In this way, readers are forced to mistrust the natural entity of the characters and the environment surrounding them that is called reality.
There are many similarites that exemplify this nearness. Moreover, both authors are located in the transition between Romanticism and Realism. They use the most typical of Romantic devices but, at the same time, these devices are transferred in their texts by their combinations with realist elements. Romantic ideology still underlies them but the main purpose for the use of these devices is to create a specific atmosphere that serves as a backdrop to rational inquiry.
There is also a strong presence of rationality that announces the Realist philosophy. Within this tension between Realism and Romanticism, the narrator plays a very important role insisting on the authenticity of his stories. As a consequence, one sees the creation of a new cosmic space and time. Readers cannot but notice how evil is punished and goodness is awarded. Poe does not accept the unexplicable if it has not been filtered by human rationality.
On the other hand, Poe believes in the independence of art from reality and in the non-moral character of it. On the contrary, Poe views death as a horrifying and fascinating event that offers men the possibility of experiencing and researching the mysteries of the universe. Men are able to manipulate the limits between life and death and achive a deeper knowledge. He tries to keep a balance between his fascination for Poe and the Catholic dogma. On the other hand, he is also conscious of the fact that by doing so, he is taking a step away from Poe. Although he emphasized his moral purposes, his main goal was to entertain and disturb.
Cuentos y novelas cortas. La Comendadora, El clavo y otros cuentos. Bonet, Laureano.
Brown, Gillian. Shawn Rosenheim and Stephen Rachman. Dayan, Joan.
Película Hotel Salvación - crítica Hotel Salvación
Dostoevski, Fyodor M. Critical Essays on Edgar Allan Poe. Eric W. Boston: G. Elmer, Jonathan. Halliburton, David. Leguen, Brigitte. Un viaje por el interior de su alma y a lo largo de su vida. Madrid: Suarez, Se llama Walimai. Puedes encontrarlo abajo si te interesa.
Sometimes I'll go a while without touching it, and other times like now I'll make a few updates within a week or two. I think a part of this is so I can keep track of observations that I've made that I would otherwise forget to write about. Here are some of my most recent observations: My overall listening comprehension is definitely improving, but I am constantly put into situations that reminds me of how much work I still have ahead of me.
We have lots of guest speakers which I think makes the class very interesting, but some lectures I don't understand a whole lot of what is being said or miss out on important details. This is very frustrating and I wish I had the ability to speak with these same people over the course of a few weeks in order to get used tot heir accents.
After realizing this I searched the forums here and came across this great post from nuncapense: viewtopic. This is something mentioned very often around here and I plan on following this advice. One podcast I have really enjoyed lately is called "los testigos del crimen" and is about famous serial killers it's close to Haloween so why not, right?
My comprehension of this material is pretty good, but I may have overestimated myself. The other day I decided to sit down with this podcast and do some intensive listening. I took out a notebook, wrote down: who, when, where,why, how, what and began listening. This forced me to really listen, and to take notes on the material.
I was surprised at how much I took out of this one episode because I was forcing myself to listen for certain materials. I also wrote down a bunch of words that I didn't know or that I liked and want to add to anki so they become part of my active vocabulary. Even though I thought my comprehension of the material was pretty good, I wrote down about 31 unknown words during a 25 minute podcast when you take away commercials. There are a few more words that I probably missed as well. I plan on reviewing all of these words, adding the useful ones to anki, and then re-listening to this podcast once I'm done.
I hope to find a few more podcasts that I like which have different speakers so I can grow used toa wider variety of accents, speakers, etc. I think I could make some noticeable improvements if I were to do this for 5 episodes of 4 different podcasts where I am listening to a total of 20 podcasts which would average out to about 10 hours.
Of course I would also relisten to each podcast after reviewing vocabulary, so that comes out to about 20 hours of listening. Not really a lot but when you consider that it is intensive listening I think it holds more weight. That is all for now. Good luck to all and thanks for any advice people have given me! I have found time to do a lot of "extensive" listening. Also, I spent 2 days in Mexico this weekend where I was able to use my Spanish. I continue to keep track of how many hours I've logged in for reading, speaking, and class time in Spanish.
Another really cool thing I just discovered is that the app I use to find podcasts has a feature that keeps track of hours spent listeing to each podcast. Here are my numbers so far: Classes in Spanish : 21 hours, 15 minutes 1 on 1 conversation : 9 hours Reading : 13 hours 38 minutes Telenovelas : 3 hours YouTube videos : 2 hours Podcasts : 13 hours, 8 minutes This comes out to roughly 62 hours of Spanish.
Not much in the grand scheme of things, but it's more than I was doing a year ago! I'd like very much to reach the following numbers by the end of the month: classes: 30 hours conversation: 15 hours Telenovelas: 8 hours YouTube: 10 hours Podcasts: 21 hours For a total of: 84 hours A year ago I would have told you that I watch a ton of TV in Spanish and listen to a ton of podcasts.
But, if you were to actually look at the numbers it would be a lot less than what I had imagined. Keeping track of numbers like this is incredibly easy to do and is a good way of making me realize how little I am actually doing, even though I think I spend a lot of time trying to perfect my Spanish.
Last edited by NoManches on Tue Oct 18, pm, edited 1 time in total. Keeping track of numbers like this is incredibly easy to do and is a good way of making me realize how little I actually doing, even though I think I spend a lot of time trying to perfect my Spanish. Without podcasts I have no clue what I would do and can only imagine how bad my Spanish would be.
Of the many podcasts I subscribe too, only a few are very interesting to me. I tend to listen to those ones for many hours, and I use the others for smaller lengths of time just to expose myself to different voices and accents.
The biggest problem for me though is finding a podcast with a "normal speaker". That is, people on the radio tend to speak very clearly and with a limited amount of slang.
When you go to a Spanish speaking country it can be difficult to find a person who speaks in this manner. I'm still looking for a podcast where the speaker has a very heavy accent, speaks super fast, etc. The closest I've come to is podcasts that interview people on the streets as part of the news. Reading: I have to read a non-fiction book for one of my classes, which means no time for "pleasure reading of extensive materials". I'm fine with that though.
The fact that I have to read in Spanish is exciting, and doing some intensive style reading is definitely a good thing. That being said, I am pressed on time so I don't have time to analyze every detail of the book. What I have been doing is this: Reading and understanding as much as I can without looking up words, but occasionally taking a difficult to understand paragraph and really breaking it down and understanding all of it.